Thursday, February 27, 2014

PMI guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)

Many large corporations are running infrastructure and product development projects that will drive the evolving business model and ensure the organisation's Value Proposition, Profit Goals and Objectives are maintained.
The organisation's internal projects will have an impact on future performance of the organisation and should be an integral part of the companies strategy for success. I have found that PMI’s Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK) to be an excellent tool for helping to define project processes and the knowledge areas required to support the projects. I have used PMBOK on some of the contracts I have worked on and keep a copy of the “Guide to the Project Management Book of Knowledge” on my Kindle. The above diagram has been extracted from PMBOK defining the five main Process Groups and the supporting Knowledge areas.
I have worked as a CIO and had to quickly learn the importance of delivering successful projects on time and to budget and meeting the demands of a successful dynamic international company. Integrating key projects to the Organisation’s Value Chain helps achieve this.

Project Management Value Chain

Critical projects that drive the future Business and Customer Value can be defined in a Value Chain and integrated with the Resource Processes allowing the impact of projects on the future business model to be assessed and corrective action taken.
The Value Chain approach establishes the value the project contributes to the success of the organisation and provides a mechanism for the key stakeholders to understand the status of the project and risks associated with delays and issues associated with not meeting the project objectives. Also the Value Chain can be decomposed into more detailed processes and activities. Below is an example of the decomposition of the Initial Process Group.
The diagram has been developed using ARIS EPC nomenclature and shows the interfaces to the Organisation’s project decision processes which in turn will link to their operational needs. Once a project has been completed it will be handed over to the operating units to manage with their feedback on the the success or failure of the deliverables.


Friday, February 21, 2014

eTOM Process Framework (Enhanced Telecom Operations Map)

I have work on a couple of Telecom and Electricity providers projects and have found the eTOM framework very useful. This model suites any organisation that provides a service and where customer service and revenue assurance is a particular issue.


The Framework is organised around seven end -to-end processes grouped into two groups of activities:
  1. Strategy Infrastructure and Products
    1. Strategy & Commitment
    2. Infrastructure Lifecycle Management
    3. Product Lifecycle Management
  2. Operations
    1. Operations Support & Readiness
    2. Fulfillment
    3. Assurance
    4. Billing
This is underpinned by a group called Enterprise Management that covers all the Resource Management processes.

Strategy Infrastructure and Product

The Strategy, Infrastructure & Product Process Grouping includes processes that develop strategy, commit to the organisation, build infrastructure, develop and manage products, and that develop and manage the Supply Chain. In the eTOM, infrastructure refers to more than just the IT and resource infrastructure that supports products and services. It includes the infrastructure required to support functional processes, e.g., CRM, HR, Marketing. The Strategy, Infrastructure and Product processes direct and enable Operations.
These processes are not day-to-day processes that interact with the customer on a regular basis.  They are processes that plan, commit, build, develop, assess and determine direction.

Operations     

The Operations Process Area is the heart of eTOM. It includes all operations processes that support the customer operations and management, as well those that enable direct customer operations with the customer.  These processes include both day-to-day and operations support and readiness processes. The eTOM view of Operations also includes sales management and supplier/partner relationship management.
The Operations (OPS) process area contains the direct operations vertical process groupings of Fulfillment, Assurance & Billing, together with the Operations Support & Readiness process grouping.  The "FAB" processes are sometimes referred to as Customer Operations processes.     

Enterprise Management

This process area includes those processes that manage enterprise-wide activities and needs, or have application within the enterprise as a whole. They encompass all business management processes that are:
  • necessary to support the whole of the enterprise, including processes for financial management, legal management, regulatory management, process, cost and quality management, etc.;
  • responsible for setting corporate policies, strategies and directions and for providing guidelines and targets for the whole of the business, including strategy development and planning, for areas such as Enterprise Architecture, that are integral to the direction and development of the business;
  • that occur throughout the enterprise, including processes for project management, performance assessments, cost assessments, etc.
  • Many process groupings within Enterprise Management will contain elements that relate to both policy setting and support of the enterprise. For example, Human Resources Management is concerned with both strategy and direction as well as supporting the management of Human Resources throughout the enterprise.
These processes are sometimes collectively considered as the “corporate” functions and/or processes.
 
For more information on the eTOM Process Framework please visit their web site at http://www.tmforum.org/ .

Sunday, February 16, 2014

APQC Process Classification Framework - PCF

At the outset of all BPM projects participants should agree a standard convention and nomenclature. It provides a means for all BPM developers and project participants to establish a consistency throughout the project and set a baseline on which future enhancements and improvements can be measured.
To provide a basis for establishing a Unique Identifier the APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF) provides a standard nomenclature framework of unique identity numbers down to the activity level that is divided into 4 levels.

  1. Category: The highest level within the PCF is indicated by whole numbers (e.g., 8.0 and 9.0)
  2. Process Group: Items with one decimal numbering (e.g., 8.1 and 9.1) are considered a process group.
  3. Process: Items with two decimal numberings (e.g., 8.1.1 and 9.1.2) are considered processes.
  4. Activity: Items with three decimal numbering (e.g. 8.3.1.1 and 9.1.1.1) are considered activities within a process.


Most Business Process Tools require that each element has a unique identifier, which is usually assigned by the software. However, in my opinion it is better to adopt a standard such as APQC – PCF as it provides a classification system for grouping processes and activities and for establishing a performance framework on which to identify areas of improvement and manage future changes.
More information on this the Process Classification Frmaework (PCF), along with downloads of generic and industry specific PCFs can be downloaded from http://www.apqc.org/process-classification-framework.
I have successfully used this framework on a WebSphere Business Modeler project, in conjunction with IBM’s Business Component Model. It proved to be an invaluable tool in lining up the business processes and activities to the Component Model structure.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Value Chain - Consumer Products Processes

Building Value Chain from Holistic Business Model

The high level processes in the Holistic Business model are transformed into a Value Chain to support the Business Modelling Profit Model. This links the lower level work activity to supporting and achieving the Goals and Objectives of the Company and provides the ability to continuously monitor the performance of the organisation. The diagram below has been created using ARIS Event-driven Process Chain (EPC) modeling language which provides a structure for drilling down from the process type/category to the process elements (activities). The process map below covers all the the process types and categories defined in the Holistic Business Model.

The diagram below shows how a hierarchical process model provides the means of monitoring the lower level activities and linking them through to the higher level end-to-end processes that impact the achievement of the companies objectives and goals. This diagram highlights the importance of Business Intelligence when implementing a Business Process Improvement (BPI) project and how other supporting projects such as Six Sigma, Balanced Scorecard and Lean Management can provide a means of identifying continuous improvement projects through the assignment of business process ownership .
To assist and ensure all processes are identified there are a number of Frameworks I have found to be  used as reference models:
  • APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF)
  • eTOM Process Framework (Enhanced Telecom Operations Map)
  • Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL)
  • Balance Scorecard
  • Supply Chain Operations Reference-model (SCOR)
  • Six Sigma
  • PMI guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
In the next few BLOGS I will discuss in more depth some of these frameworks. In addition to frameworks for building a business architecture there is a need to document the design process and there also a number of frameworks that can serve as a structured repository for this purpose.


Saturday, January 18, 2014

Resource Management Process - Regulatory Management

Process Objectives


  1. Minimise litigation
  2. Protect adequately against loss while minimizing costs
  3. Comply with regulatory requirements
  4. Improve environmental and safety conditions

Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)

    A.   Adequate insurance with appropriate coverage (2)
    B.   Awareness training to educate against violations (1,3)
    C.   Monitor and manage environmental changes (1,4)
    D.   Maintain safe, clean, well-organized facilities (1,3,4)
    C.   Minimise and control use of hazardous materials (4)
    E.   Adequate procedures regarding lawsuit handling (1)

Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) Linked to CSF’s

  • Insurance-related expenses vs prior years; amount of uncovered losses vs additional cost to cover (A)
  • Worker complaints; relevant training hours per employee per year (B)
  • Dollars spent monitoring environment (C)
  • Days without loss -of -work injury; workers’ compensation claims rates; dollars and number of environmental fines (D)
  • Measure of toxic products produced or used in production (E)
  • Number of new lawsuits and lawsuits settled (by type)

Inputs

  • Strategic plan
  • Independent research
  • Regulatory experts
  • Regulatory laws and guidelines
  • ·Historical litigation data
  • External regulatory environment
  • Training curriculum

Activities

Outputs

  • Litigation reports
  • Litigation projections / analyses
  • Regulatory projections / analyses
  • Regulatory reports
  • Retention agreements

Systems

  • Budgeting
  • Payable / disbursement
  • General ledger
  • Regulatory / legal databases

Classes of Transactions

Routine
  • Insurance expense
  • Premiums payable
  • Legal/regulatory expenses
Non-Routine
  • Lawsuit settlements
  • Regulatory settlements
Accounting Estimates
  • Loss reserves - litigation
  • Loss reserves - regulatory

Risks Which Threaten Objectives

    A.   Regulatory violations resulting in losses (1,2,3,4)
    B.   Settlement expenses (1)
    C.   Insurance rate increases (2,4)
    D.   Negative publicity from environmental issues (1,4)
    E.   Company is not safety/environmentally-conscious (4)
    F.   Contingent liabilities exist but are not known (3,4)

Management Responses Linked to Risks

  • Monitor exam reports for violations (A)
  • Monitor number of new lawsuits and number settled; review total cost breakdown (indemnity, fees, etc.) (B)
  • Monitor insurance rates and rate “market” (C)
  • Track company response to issues; monitoring of competitors’ issues (D)
  • Establish responsibility for monitoring adherence; establish/monitor relationships with regulators (E)
  • Periodic reviews by experts as to conditions; monitor complaints, fines and claims (F)

Other Symptoms of Poor Performance

  • High or increasing average cost per case
  • High outside counsel costs
  • Property acquisitions without environmental due diligence
  • Lack of negotiated fees
  • Uncertainty as to total environmental costs

Performance Improvement Observations


  • Expert testimony / litigation assistance
  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Law department review
  • Tax advice for pollution control investment
  • Quality assessment / compliance audits
  • Risk assessment diagnostic
  • Litigation management diagnostic
  • Environmental due diligence
  • Environmental benchmarking

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Resource Management Process - Property Management

Process Objectives


  1. Control capital expenditures
  2. Acquire/construct facilities at acceptable technological/reconfiguration levels
  3. Optimise capacity
  4. Reduce risk of loss and improve safety environment

Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)

    A.   Accurately plan equipment and facilities needs (1,2,3)
    B.   Procedures to follow environmental regulations/safety training (4)
    C.   Establish maintenance procedures (1,4)
    D.   Maintain current disaster recovery plan (DRP) (4)
    E.   Establish proper procurement procedures (1,2)
    F.   Monitor developments in technology/facilities (2,3)

Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) Linked to CSF’s


  • Square feet utilized/divided by total available; square feet and cost per square foot by department (A)
  • Ratio of insurance premium costs to coverage; number and cost of environmental fines (B)
  • Maintenance costs to total operating costs; equipment write-offs (C)
  • Modifications to disaster recovery plan (D)
  • Percentage of orders where discounts taken; costs per unit by vendor (E)
  • Equipment/technology costs by department (F)

Inputs

  • Strategic plan
  • Capital budgets
  • Operating budgets
  • Suppliers
  • Construction plans
  • Economic environment
  • Demographic information
  • Maintenance schedule
  • Regulations

Activities


Outputs

  • Make/buy analysis
  • Disaster recovery plans
  • Capital budgets
  • Machinery and equipment
  • Land and buildings
  • Risk management plan
  • Supplier contracts
  • Operating information

Systems

  • Fixed asset
  • Disbursement / payable
  • Budget
  • Payroll / scheduling
  • General ledger
  • Space management

Classes of Transactions

Routine

  • Fixed asset additions
  • Insurance expense
  • Depreciation expense
  • Maintenance expense
Non-Routine

  • Lease classification
  • Incentives / abatements
  • Gain / loss on sale
  • Interest capitalisation
Accounting Estimates

  • Impairment of long-lived assets
  • Uninsured loss accruals
  • Depreciation methods / lives

Risks Which Threaten Objectives

    A.   Insufficient or excessive capacity (3)
    B.   Uninsured or underinsured losses (1,4)
    C.   Impairment in value of assets (2,3)
    D.   Inability to acquire needed assets on time (2)
    F.    Cash flow not sufficient to fund capital expenditures (2)
    G.   No contingency plans for unexpected events (4)

Management Responses Linked to Risks


  • Create and monitor facilities plans; compare costs to operate to outsourcing; compare actual utilisation plan (A)
  • Conduct environmental and safety reviews; monitor legal and regulatory initiatives (B,C)
  • Monitor maintenance plans/periodic inspection; monitor new developments and technology (D)
  • Maintain relationships with suppliers; obtain competitive bids (D)
  • Monitor capital budgets; compare costs to operating budgets and industry (E)
  • Periodically monitor feasibility of disaster recovery plan (F)

Other Symptoms of Poor Performance

  • Excessive machinery downtime
  • Capital project overages (costs and time)
  • Manual systems / workflow
  • Excessive number of suppliers
  • Excessive workers’ compensation claims
  • Increasing property tax

Performance Improvement Observations


  • Procurement review
  • Maintenance systems review
  • Improved fixed asset systems
  • Property tax representation
  • Business incentives consulting
  • Management reporting review
  • Capacity review
  • Benchmarking study
  • Environmental assessment review

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Resource Management Process - Human Resource Management

Process Objectives


  • Attract and retain skilled and motivated workforce
  • Control employee costs while maintaining morale and productivity
  • Comply with regulatory/tax filing requirements
  • Adherence to code of conduct

Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)

    A.   Commitment to training and development (1,2)
    B.   Retention of key personnel (1,2)
    C.   Maintain competitive compensation/benefit packages (1,2)
    D,   Optimise employee utilisation and productivity (2)
    E.   Employee commitment to customers (1,4)
    F.   Optimise human resource administration efficiencies (3,4)

Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) Linked to CSF’s


  • Training hours per employee; training dollars per employee (A)
  • Employee turnover (B)
  • Employee turnover; compensation/benefit levels compared to the industry (C)
  • Sales per employee; payroll to sales (D)
  • Customer complaint percentage; customer surveys/focus groups (E)
  • Human resource employees/total employees; human resource department costs to sales (F)

Inputs

  • Strategic plan
  • Operating plan
  • Resource requests
  • Employee regulations
  • Tax regulations
  • Union contracts
  • Industry statistics and market data
  • Training goals / requests
  • Personnel feedback

Activities


Outputs

  • Regulatory filings
  • Compensation and benefits policies and administration
  • Personnel files
  • Tax filings
  • Human resource policies/procedures
  • Training programmes
  • Performance reviews
  • Payroll and benefits disbursements
  • Staffing and cost data

Systems

  • Human resource management
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Tax system
  • Regulatory systems
  • Cash disbursements / payables systems
  • Employee self-service systems

Classes of Transactions

Routine

  • Payroll and benefit expenses
  • Payroll related accruals
  • Training expenses
Non-Routine

  • Pensions
  • Other post-retirement benefits
  • Post-employment benefits
  • Incentive compensation accruals
Accounting Estimates
  • Self-insured medical
  • Self-insured workers’ compensation
  • Self-insured general liability claims

Risks Which Threaten Objectives

    A.   High level of staff turnover (1,2)
    B.   Poorly motivated staff (2)
    C.   Non-compliance with regulations (tax, labour, etc.) (3,4)
    D.   Lack of personnel with skill sets needed (1)
    E.   Non-competitive compensation packages (1)

Management Responses Linked to Risks


  • Conduct employee surveys with follow-up on results; implement growth and opportunity plans for employees (A,B)
  • Compare incentive pay to performance; conduct employee surveys with follow up on results; monitor labour relations and establish employee grievance committees (B)
  • Regulatory monitoring (C)
  • Establish formal hiring criteria; develop and implement effective training programmes (D)
  • Compare salary costs to industry norms; compare incentive pay to performance (E)

Other Symptoms of Poor Performance

  • Poor internal communication
  • Fines and penalties for untimely, inaccurate tax and regulatory filings
  • High level of absenteeism
  • Inconsistent employee management
  • Low productivity
  • High level of customer complaints

Performance Improvement Observations


  • Incentive compensation consulting
  • Managed health care studies
  • Claims systems reviews
  • Retirement plan reviews
  • Human resource department re-engineering
  • Human resource benchmarking